District-wise Vulnerability Profile of Assam
Figure: Map of Districts of Assam with vulnerability ranking (low – moderate – high – vulnerability)
Assam Climate Change Management Society (ACCMS), Govt. of Assam and State Climate Change Cell, Assam carried out a District-level Vulnerability Assessment of Assam based on the guidelines of the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India with support from the National Mission for Sustaining the Himalayan Ecosystem (NMSHE).
This assessment is a part of the report titled ‘Climate Vulnerability Assessment for Adaptation Planning in India using a Common Framework’ published by the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India.
This district-level vulnerability assessment identifies the most vulnerable districts of Assam with respect to current climate risk and the main drivers of vulnerability and prepares a relative vulnerability profile of all the districts of Assam. The integrated vulnerability assessment was adopted which is based on biophysical, socio-economic, and institution and infrastructure-related indicators.
The following 15 (fifteen) state-specific indicators were selected to conduct this assessment:
Percentage of Households having Monthly income of highest earning household member Less than Rs. 5,000 in rural areas (2011) | The proportion of rain-fed agriculture | Forest area per 100 rural population (2019) |
Percentage f Women’s participation in the workforce | Average person days per household employed under MGNREGA | Road Density |
Infant Mortality rate | Percentage of Households with Electricity (NHFS) | Percentage HH with an improved drinking water source (NHFS) |
Percentage HH using improved sanitation facility (NHFS) | Percentage of Female literacy rate (NHFS) | Coefficient of variation/ yield variability of food grains |
Based on the indicators’ functional relationship with vulnerability (either positive or negative relationships), normalized values were calculated against each of the indicators. A vulnerability index was prepared based on the normalized values.
Class | District | Rank |
High Vulnerability | Dhubri | 1 |
Darrang | 2 | |
Karimganj | 3 | |
Kokrajhar | 4 | |
Golaghat | 5 | |
Goalpara | 5 | |
Hailakandi | 6 | |
Morigaon | 6 | |
Tinsukia | 7 | |
Moderate Vulnerability | Chirang | 8 |
Sonitpur | 9 | |
Bongaigaon | 10 | |
Cachar | 11 | |
Karbi Anglong | 12 | |
Nagaon | 12 | |
Dibrugarh | 13 | |
Barpeta | 13 | |
Sivasagar | 13 | |
Dhemaji | 14 | |
Lakhimpur | 14 | |
Jorhat | 14 | |
Baksa | 14 | |
Dima Hasao | 15 | |
Udalguri | 15 | |
Low Vulnerability | Nalbari | 16 |
Kamrup | 17 | |
Kamrup Metropolitan | 18 |
Figure: Distribution of districts on a vulnerability Scale of Very Low to Very High Vulnerability
Major drivers of vulnerability:
In order to find the major drivers from the calculated NV a criterion was adopted by setting up a threshold value of 0.8499 and considering the sub-indicators which showed maximum numbers of districts above the threshold level.
It is evident from the assessment that five (05) out of the 15 indicators viz. The percentage of area covered under centrally funded crop insurance (PMFBY, WBCIS), Proportion of rain-fed agriculture, Forest area per 100 rural population, Percentage of Women’s participation in the workforce, and Road Density are the major drivers of vulnerability.
Figure: Drivers of vulnerability at the district level
What is Vulnerability Assessment?
Vulnerability is conceptualized as an internal property of a system that is a function of its current endogenous lack of (adaptive) capacity to overcome the adverse impact (its sensitivity) of a stressor. In anticipation of a climatic hazard or a non-climatic hazard stressor. Therefore, the vulnerability of a natural ecosystem or socio-economic system is assessed as a function of its sensitivity (that determines the first-order impact of a hazard/stressor on the system) to such hazard/stressor and its lack of (adaptive) capacity to overcome such sensitivity.
Figure: The Risk Management and Assessment Framework, IPCC 2014